<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyer Lunch &#187; Business+Finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyerlunch.com/category/business-and-finance-legal-news-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyerlunch.com</link>
	<description>Real Law.  Real Life.  Real Tasty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Juror Can&#8217;t Keep Quiet: Trial Twitter Tweet Could Cost 12 Million Bucks</title>
		<link>http://lawyerlunch.com/juror-quiet-trial-twitter-tweet-cost-12-million-bucks/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyerlunch.com/juror-quiet-trial-twitter-tweet-cost-12-million-bucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Karpf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A+ Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business+Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bozos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Karpf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerlunch.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyer Lunch: Hey Jonathan, if you wanted out of the jury, you could've just pulled the good 'ole Larry David stunt!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $12 million jury verdict in Arkanksas is now being appealed after it was learned that one of the jurors was posting on twitter about the case during the trial.  Stoam Holdings owner Russell Wright is looking to overturn the verdict against him and his company.  Stoam was that alleged ponzi scheme whereby people sold &#8220;stoam&#8221; &#8211; some crazy substance that insulated like foam and was strong as steal (&#8220;stoam&#8221; &#8211; get it?).  </p>
<p>One of the smarty-pants jurors (&#8220;Juror Jonathan&#8221; of Fayetteville, Arkansas) tweeted the following message on twitter:  &#8220;oh and nobody buy Stoam. Its [sic] bad mojo and they&#8217;ll probably cease to Exist, now that their wallet is 12m lighter.&#8221;  What is it with these people?  If you are going to break a rule, be a little smarter and don&#8217;t broadcast it to the world.  This bozo blunder is painstakingly reminiscent of the <a href="http://lawyerlunch.com/judge-friends-defense-lawyer-facebook-reprimanded-parte-communication/">Judge Lawyer Ex Parte Communication on Facebook</a>story.</p>
<p>For those you don&#8217;t know what twitter is (do you sleep all day?), its basically a system where people broadcast what they are doing, for all the world to see.  If you don&#8217;t know what twitter is, chances are you won&#8217;t understand why it would even exist.  Fortunately or unfortunately, it&#8217;s a world full of yentas, and some people are obsessed with reading that Jack loves eating his cherry pie, or that Wanda is reading a book that she is enjoying soooo much.  </p>
<p>The problem with Juror Jonathan is that jurors are usually told not to discuss or share any information about the trial to or with the public.  Good one, Jonathan.  </p>
<p>So we&#8217;re entering the realm of twitter legal issues.  Well here&#8217;s my tweet for the day &#8211; Lawyer Lunch: Hey Jonathan, if you wanted out of the jury, you could&#8217;ve just pulled the good &#8216;ole Larry David stunt!</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Juror+Can%E2%80%99t+Keep+Quiet%3A+Trial+Twitter+Tweet+Could+Cost+12+Million+Bucks+http://xahs8.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lawyerlunch.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro1.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Juror+Can%E2%80%99t+Keep+Quiet%3A+Trial+Twitter+Tweet+Could+Cost+12+Million+Bucks+http://xahs8.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyerlunch.com/juror-quiet-trial-twitter-tweet-cost-12-million-bucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coked Up:  90 Percent of U.S. Money has Traces of Cocaine</title>
		<link>http://lawyerlunch.com/coked-up-90-percent-of-u-s-money-has-traces-of-cocaine/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyerlunch.com/coked-up-90-percent-of-u-s-money-has-traces-of-cocaine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Karpf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business+Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legally Irrelevant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocaine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerlunch.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bank tellers who deal with large quantities of bills can inhale enough cocaine "dust" to actually test positive for the drug. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent study shows that 90% of U.S. paper money contains traces of cocaine.  Perhaps not surprisingly, $5, $10, $20, and $50 bills are more likely to have traces of the drug than $1 bills.  Next time you tell your kid not to put their hands in their mouth after touching money, remember to add their nose to that equation.</p>
<p>It is possible that bills testing positive for cocaine may not have actually been used by someone snorting the drug, but may have come into contact with other such bills inside dollar counting machines at banks.  The study also revealed that the levels of cocaine found on the bills is not enough to spark any health alarms.  However, bank tellers who deal with large quantities of bills can inhale enough cocaine &#8220;dust&#8221; to actually test positive for the drug.  That explains alot &#8211; how else could bank tellers appear so happy and stimulated in an arguably not-so-stimulating and happy line of work?</p>
<p>The United States had the highest (no pun intended) percentage of tainted currency, followed by Canada.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Coked+Up%3A++90+Percent+of+U.S.+Money+has+Traces+of+Cocaine+http://9tpim.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lawyerlunch.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro1.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Coked+Up%3A++90+Percent+of+U.S.+Money+has+Traces+of+Cocaine+http://9tpim.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyerlunch.com/coked-up-90-percent-of-u-s-money-has-traces-of-cocaine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
