<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyer Lunch &#187; jury awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyerlunch.com/tag/jury-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyerlunch.com</link>
	<description>Real Law.  Real Life.  Real Tasty.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Juror Can&#8217;t Keep Quiet: Trial Twitter Tweet Could Cost 12 Million Bucks</title>
		<link>http://lawyerlunch.com/juror-quiet-trial-twitter-tweet-cost-12-million-bucks/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyerlunch.com/juror-quiet-trial-twitter-tweet-cost-12-million-bucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Karpf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A+ Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business+Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bozos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Karpf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerlunch.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyer Lunch: Hey Jonathan, if you wanted out of the jury, you could've just pulled the good 'ole Larry David stunt!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $12 million jury verdict in Arkanksas is now being appealed after it was learned that one of the jurors was posting on twitter about the case during the trial.  Stoam Holdings owner Russell Wright is looking to overturn the verdict against him and his company.  Stoam was that alleged ponzi scheme whereby people sold &#8220;stoam&#8221; &#8211; some crazy substance that insulated like foam and was strong as steal (&#8220;stoam&#8221; &#8211; get it?).  </p>
<p>One of the smarty-pants jurors (&#8220;Juror Jonathan&#8221; of Fayetteville, Arkansas) tweeted the following message on twitter:  &#8220;oh and nobody buy Stoam. Its [sic] bad mojo and they&#8217;ll probably cease to Exist, now that their wallet is 12m lighter.&#8221;  What is it with these people?  If you are going to break a rule, be a little smarter and don&#8217;t broadcast it to the world.  This bozo blunder is painstakingly reminiscent of the <a href="http://lawyerlunch.com/judge-friends-defense-lawyer-facebook-reprimanded-parte-communication/">Judge Lawyer Ex Parte Communication on Facebook</a>story.</p>
<p>For those you don&#8217;t know what twitter is (do you sleep all day?), its basically a system where people broadcast what they are doing, for all the world to see.  If you don&#8217;t know what twitter is, chances are you won&#8217;t understand why it would even exist.  Fortunately or unfortunately, it&#8217;s a world full of yentas, and some people are obsessed with reading that Jack loves eating his cherry pie, or that Wanda is reading a book that she is enjoying soooo much.  </p>
<p>The problem with Juror Jonathan is that jurors are usually told not to discuss or share any information about the trial to or with the public.  Good one, Jonathan.  </p>
<p>So we&#8217;re entering the realm of twitter legal issues.  Well here&#8217;s my tweet for the day &#8211; Lawyer Lunch: Hey Jonathan, if you wanted out of the jury, you could&#8217;ve just pulled the good &#8216;ole Larry David stunt!</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Juror+Can%E2%80%99t+Keep+Quiet%3A+Trial+Twitter+Tweet+Could+Cost+12+Million+Bucks+http://xahs8.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lawyerlunch.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro1.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Juror+Can%E2%80%99t+Keep+Quiet%3A+Trial+Twitter+Tweet+Could+Cost+12+Million+Bucks+http://xahs8.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyerlunch.com/juror-quiet-trial-twitter-tweet-cost-12-million-bucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wife Smoked like Chimney, Husband Awarded $1.9 Million</title>
		<link>http://lawyerlunch.com/wife-smoked-like-chimney-husband-awarded-1-9-million/</link>
		<comments>http://lawyerlunch.com/wife-smoked-like-chimney-husband-awarded-1-9-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Karpf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A+ Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerlunch.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 92 year-old Florida man was awarded $1.9 million in compensatory damages for the death of his Wife, who smoked 2 packs-a-day since she was 16.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 92 year-old Florida man was awarded $1.9 million in compensatory damages for the death of his Wife, who smoked 2 packs-a-day since she was 16.  The Marlboro-preferring lady died of lung cancer in her 70&#8242;s.  The jury actually found damages of $5.3 million, but that tobacco bigwig and cigarette maker Phillip-Morris was only 36.5% at fault.  The other 63.5% was attributed to the lady&#8217;s choice and desire to continue smoking.  You think?</p>
<p>This case came after the Florida Supreme Court decertified a class-action suit, leaving thousands of individual plaintiffs.  To streamline things a bit, the Court adopted some factional findings from the precedent Engle case, so that they &#8220;don&#8217;t have to start from square one in each of these cases,&#8221; said Ed Sweda, a lawyer for the Tobacco Products Liability Project in Boston, Massachusetts.</p>
<p>There are still over 150 similar Engle cases pending.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Wife+Smoked+like+Chimney%2C+Husband+Awarded+%241.9+Million+http://pbz2o.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://lawyerlunch.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro1.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Wife+Smoked+like+Chimney%2C+Husband+Awarded+%241.9+Million+http://pbz2o.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawyerlunch.com/wife-smoked-like-chimney-husband-awarded-1-9-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
